Skip to content
Endlech.lu Logo

Open Startup

How Endlech.lu is doing

3

Restaurants on the platform

3 of them checked on site by the team ยท 2 communes across 1 cantons

We ask restaurants to be open about how accessible they are. We hold ourselves to the same standard: how many venues are listed, how many we have checked in person, what running the platform costs and where the money comes from. Platform and impact figures come straight from the database; the finances we maintain by hand each month.

The platform

All figures are computed live from the database and refreshed hourly.

Checked by the team

3

unchanged since 2026-08

100.0 % of all entries

Communes

2 / 100

unchanged since 2026-08

2.0 % of the country

Avg. score

4.0 / 10

unchanged since 2026-08

Average across 3 assessed venues. Eight equally weighted criteria; what is not recorded counts as not met.

Score distribution

How many restaurants meet how many of the eight accessibility criteria. Measurements that were never taken count as not met โ€“ the figure measures documented accessibility, not assumed accessibility.

Score from 0 to 10
Show figures as a table
Avg. score Restaurants Share
0 / 10 0 0.0 %
1 / 10 1 33.3 %
2 / 10 0 0.0 %
3 / 10 0 0.0 %
4 / 10 0 0.0 %
5 / 10 1 33.3 %
6 / 10 1 33.3 %
7 / 10 0 0.0 %
8 / 10 0 0.0 %
9 / 10 0 0.0 %
10 / 10 0 0.0 %

Coverage by canton

All twelve cantons are listed, including those without a single entry. The blank spots are the more honest half of the picture.

Coverage by canton
Canton Restaurants Checked by the team Communes
Esch-sur-Alzette 3 3 2 / 14
Capellen 0 0 0 / 10
Clervaux 0 0 0 / 5
Diekirch 0 0 0 / 10
Echternach 0 0 0 / 7
Grevenmacher 0 0 0 / 8
Luxembourg 0 0 0 / 10
Mersch 0 0 0 / 10
Redange 0 0 0 / 9
Remich 0 0 0 / 7
Vianden 0 0 0 / 3
Wiltz 0 0 0 / 7

What it achieves

Documented facts โ€“ no estimates, no extrapolation.

Step-free entrances

2

of 3 restaurants

Accessible restrooms

2

of 3 restaurants

Assistance dogs welcome

2

of 3 restaurants

Doors from 90 cm

0

of 0 measured

Table spacing from 90 cm

0

of 0 measured

Inclusion Boxes delivered

0

From the material receipts

Door widths and table spacing exist only where someone actually took a tape measure. That is why these two figures are given against the number of measured venues rather than the total.

Finances

Aggregated by category. There is no breakdown per restaurant and no partner is named โ€“ what we do not record, we cannot accidentally publish.

Expenses

โ‚ฌ69.71

Everything running the platform has cost so far.

๐ŸŒ Domain โ‚ฌ47.81
โœ‰๏ธ Email delivery โ‚ฌ21.90

Income

Not published yet

We only show income once a full quarter of data exists. A figure covering two weeks says nothing about whether the project is sustainable โ€“ it would only create a false impression, in one direction or the other.

Financial data last maintained on 01.09.2026. ยท All amounts in euro, aggregated by category.

Over time

Monthly figures recorded at the time. They are not recalculated from today's data โ€“ otherwise the history would change retroactively whenever someone edits an entry.

Restaurants

3
2026-07 2026-08

Avg. score

4.0 / 10
2026-07 2026-08
Show figures as a table
Month Restaurants Checked by the team Communes Avg. score
2026-08 3 3 2 4.00
2026-07 3 3 2 4.00

Free to use

Open data

The full accessibility dataset to download โ€“ for your own analysis, research or reporting. Free to use with attribution.

The dataset is published under CC BY 4.0. Email addresses and phone numbers are deliberately excluded: a bulk export of those would be a mailing list, not an accessibility dataset.