Open Startup
How Endlech.lu is doing
3
Restaurants on the platform
3 of them checked on site by the team ยท 2 communes across 1 cantons
We ask restaurants to be open about how accessible they are. We hold ourselves to the same standard: how many venues are listed, how many we have checked in person, what running the platform costs and where the money comes from. Platform and impact figures come straight from the database; the finances we maintain by hand each month.
The platform
All figures are computed live from the database and refreshed hourly.
Checked by the team
unchanged since 2026-08
100.0 % of all entries
Communes
unchanged since 2026-08
2.0 % of the country
Avg. score
unchanged since 2026-08
Average across 3 assessed venues. Eight equally weighted criteria; what is not recorded counts as not met.
Score distribution
How many restaurants meet how many of the eight accessibility criteria. Measurements that were never taken count as not met โ the figure measures documented accessibility, not assumed accessibility.
Show figures as a table
| Avg. score | Restaurants | Share |
|---|---|---|
| 0 / 10 | 0 | 0.0 % |
| 1 / 10 | 1 | 33.3 % |
| 2 / 10 | 0 | 0.0 % |
| 3 / 10 | 0 | 0.0 % |
| 4 / 10 | 0 | 0.0 % |
| 5 / 10 | 1 | 33.3 % |
| 6 / 10 | 1 | 33.3 % |
| 7 / 10 | 0 | 0.0 % |
| 8 / 10 | 0 | 0.0 % |
| 9 / 10 | 0 | 0.0 % |
| 10 / 10 | 0 | 0.0 % |
Coverage by canton
All twelve cantons are listed, including those without a single entry. The blank spots are the more honest half of the picture.
| Canton | Restaurants | Checked by the team | Communes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esch-sur-Alzette | 3 | 3 | 2 / 14 |
| Capellen | 0 | 0 | 0 / 10 |
| Clervaux | 0 | 0 | 0 / 5 |
| Diekirch | 0 | 0 | 0 / 10 |
| Echternach | 0 | 0 | 0 / 7 |
| Grevenmacher | 0 | 0 | 0 / 8 |
| Luxembourg | 0 | 0 | 0 / 10 |
| Mersch | 0 | 0 | 0 / 10 |
| Redange | 0 | 0 | 0 / 9 |
| Remich | 0 | 0 | 0 / 7 |
| Vianden | 0 | 0 | 0 / 3 |
| Wiltz | 0 | 0 | 0 / 7 |
What it achieves
Documented facts โ no estimates, no extrapolation.
Step-free entrances
of 3 restaurants
Accessible restrooms
of 3 restaurants
Assistance dogs welcome
of 3 restaurants
Doors from 90 cm
of 0 measured
Table spacing from 90 cm
of 0 measured
Inclusion Boxes delivered
From the material receipts
Door widths and table spacing exist only where someone actually took a tape measure. That is why these two figures are given against the number of measured venues rather than the total.
Finances
Aggregated by category. There is no breakdown per restaurant and no partner is named โ what we do not record, we cannot accidentally publish.
Expenses
โฌ69.71
Everything running the platform has cost so far.
Income
Not published yet
We only show income once a full quarter of data exists. A figure covering two weeks says nothing about whether the project is sustainable โ it would only create a false impression, in one direction or the other.
Financial data last maintained on 01.09.2026. ยท All amounts in euro, aggregated by category.
Over time
Monthly figures recorded at the time. They are not recalculated from today's data โ otherwise the history would change retroactively whenever someone edits an entry.
Restaurants
Avg. score
Show figures as a table
| Month | Restaurants | Checked by the team | Communes | Avg. score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4.00 |
| 2026-07 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4.00 |
Free to use
Open data
The full accessibility dataset to download โ for your own analysis, research or reporting. Free to use with attribution.
The dataset is published under CC BY 4.0. Email addresses and phone numbers are deliberately excluded: a bulk export of those would be a mailing list, not an accessibility dataset.